Review of Griffin 25 mini by GeekVape

Review of Griffin 25 mini by GeekVape

GeekVape continues to milk the cow while it gives milk by releasing a new version of the tank from the Griffin series. This time they decided to make a mini version called Griffin 25 mini. As you have realized, the diameter of the tank has not changed, but the height and volume have significantly decreased. The design remained completely unchanged, the tank still looks just as awesome, so I don’t see any further point in talking about it.

Griffin 25 mini by GeekVape

But inside, the tank looks like it’s a completely different device. The guys from GeekVape decided to completely redesign the Velocity base. According to them, this is done to increase the working volume. I don’t know if this is true, but they look unequivocally cooler. The diameter of the base is 18mm, the diameter of the holes in the posts remained unchanged. e-cigarettes online boutique in canada But the blow holes have increased to 5.3×4.5 mm. The kit comes with the usual plug for one of the sides.

Griffin 25 mini by GeekVape

The top-airflow options are still present, and I still consider them completely useless, as they do not interact with the winding, but just cool the vapor and make it more flavorless. Plus this version is a bit higher and a bit more expensive.

The tank volume is 3 ml compared to 6 ml of the standard version. When reducing the size, you always have to sacrifice something. But the convenient top-fill fully compensates for this disadvantage.

Griffin 25 mini by GeekVape

The blowing holes also remained unchanged, so there should be no problems with blowing. The tank will be able to cope with the same high power as the older version.

Well, it’s time to summarize the results. To be honest, if I were given a choice between the standard version and the mini, I would choose the second one. Firstly, I like the way the base looks better, and secondly, I am not at all embarrassed by the volume of 3 ml, because the convenient top filling fully compensates for this inconvenience. The price for the tank is more than acceptable.

Similar Posts

  • Review of Smoant Pasito Pod System Vape Kit

    After POD-systems appeared on vaping market, many vapers began to use them with pleasure for two reasons – compact size and possibility to vaporize salt nicotine based liquids. But at the same time such systems have a significant drawback – the need to change the cartridge after some time of use and loss of flavor,…

  • Review of mechanical mod OWL

    We present to your attention the OWL mechanical mod. The package and technical characteristics of the OWL mechanical mod I don’t want any unnecessary praise — let’s get straight to the point, because there is something to share. First of all, I want to focus on the presentation of the device — it’s just a…

  • Review of Broadside ADMIRAL Mod

    In this review, I will tell you about a clone of the copper mechanical mod Broadside Admiral from BJ box mods for 20700 batteries. Packaging and equipment of Broadside Admiral The clone, like the original, is packed in a cardboard tube. The design of both is the same, including additional logos on the ends of…

  • Review of Artery PAL II Pod Starter Kit

    More and more vapers have recently decided to use a POD system instead of the usual box mod with a tank/drip. This is not surprising, since not everyone likes big clouds, massive devices and the need to constantly refill the atomizer. When using POD systems, the vaper receives a compact and autonomous device, initially designed…

  • Review of Upends UPONE disposables 

    In this review I will tell you about my impressions of UPONE disposables, released by Ald under the Upends brand. Let’s start with the introduction of the manufacturer, it is already known to us (and you) company ALD Group Limited. Earlier it was noted for the release of Pods – Mango, Pearl, VTurn-Pro, Sentry, Tee…

  • Review of Reload RTA MTL

    Opinions of vapers who use bacomizers have been disagreeing for years about which inhaler or cigarette inhaler is better, with the same controversy regarding the taste of tanks with different inhaler inhalations. Practice shows that both types are constantly in demand, and it is impossible to say which one is more in demand. And if…